Skip to main content

AI-Assisted Cheating on Online Exams is Increasingly Vexing Issue in Higher Education

According to ProctorTrack.com, artificial intelligence (AI) has changed the online assessment landscape, as students and test-takers now have access to AI assistants, chatbots, browser extensions, automated search tools, and other technologies that can provide information almost instantly. As this web service notes, this creates a new challenge for universities, certification organizations, training providers, and employers conducting remote assessments given that traditional exam security often focuses on preventing access to websites, applications, or unauthorized materials. Given that modern AI-enabled cheating can involve multiple layers of technology, ProctorTrack.com notes that effective online exam security now requires more than simply watching the candidate or restricting a browser - it requires securing the testing environment itself. Because this level of security is likely to be prohibitively costly, TurnItIn.com suggests conducting efficient digital assessments without an internet connection. Put differently, now that ‘secure’ online exams are less safe against operating system-level AI misconduct, schools and universities should now be considering a fully offline exam model as an effective alternative. According to another assessment service, TurnItIn.com, that doesn’t mean reverting to handwritten assessments and grading, which many institutions cannot realistically afford given growing class sizes and resource constraints. An offline digital exam platform creates an ‘air gap’ that denies AI the three things it needs to bypass ‘secure’ online platforms: computation, connectivity, and content. As TurnItIn.com explains, "computation" requires use of a stripped-down, secure operating system with no built-in AI or extra agents. "Connectivity" means no network or internet access – cloud-based AI can’t be accessed. Lastly, "content" refers to an isolated exam window – one in which AI can’t see or capture content, and the student can’t feed content to AI. Both online services provide their respective descriptions of the problems higher ed now faces in this regard as a tool to sell their products. ProctorTrack.com offers a package that combines secure testing controls with multi-factor biometric authentication and continuous identity verification (i.e., facial recognition), while TurnItIn offers ExamSoft, which provides fully offline digital exams. The expense of these solutions will also likely be prohibitive to higher ed institutions around the country. Of course, the Turner College is grappling with the assessment of online education issues discussed above, which are undoubtedly inflating grades as we pen this post. In the Turner College itself, the problems listed above are likely impacting assessment much more widely in the Department of Management and Marketing than in the Department of Accounting and Finance for at least two reasons. First, whereas about 79% of headcount enrollments in fall 2026 courses with MGMT, MISM and MKTG prefixes fall into online course sections, only about 42% of headcount enrollments in fall 2026 courses with ACCT and FINC prefixes fall into online course sections. Second, the Turner College's new Director of Assessment, Gisung Moon, is also the Chair of the Department of Accounting and Finance, and his departmental faculty are implementing an online testing procedure involving utilization of the laptop camera facing the online student as well as the camera in the test taker's cellphone, which is situated in landscape mode several feet to one side of the student during the examination. This process was successfully piloted over summer 2026. Stay connected to Turner Business for more on this growing problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ABDC Releases 2025 Journal Review, Now Ranks Journal Edited by Phil Bryant

The long-awaited journal review being conducted by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) has been released and there are a number of news items that relate to faculty in the Turner College. One of these is the ABDC's decision to now include  Compensation and Benefits Review in its journal rankings. This is big news for the Turner College as its editor, Phil Bryant , is a professor of management in the Turner College. The ABDC is proposing that the journal enter its system for the first time as a C-rated journal. Acting Turner College Dean Tesa Leonce sits on the journal's editorial board, while Turner College management professor Mark James has guest-edited an issue of the journal. Published by SAGE,  Compensation & Benefits Review is the leading journal for senior executives and professionals who design, implement, evaluate and communicate compensation and benefits policies and programs. The journal supports compensation and benefits specialists and academic ex...

Deborah Kidder's Tenure as Dean of the Turner College Set to End on December 12th

The Turner College community was informed this morning that Deborah Kidder 's tenure as Dean of the organization is set to end on December 12, 2025. An e-mail communication to Turner College faculty from CSU Provost & Executive Vice President Dustin Anderson states, " I am writing to share that Dr. Deborah Kidder will be stepping down as Dean of the Turner College of Business & Technology, effective December 12, 2025. Under . . . Kidder's guidance, the college achieved a number of milestones, such as maintaining our AACSB accreditation, and the establishment of a Business Transfer Articulation with Columbus Technical College. We appreciate . . . Kidder’s service and contributions to the college during her time as Dean.  In the interim, . . . Tesa Leonce-Regalado will be appointed Acting Dean to lead the college while we conduct a national search . . .  John Finley has agreed to serve as Acting Associate Dean to support our faculty and students during this time as w...

The New Financial Times Top 50 Business Journals Just Released

The newest list of Top 50 journals in business has been released by The Financial Times . This list is used by many of the top business schools around the globe to evaluate business faculty. Containing only 50 journals, this list is generally too restrictive to use as an assessment tool at most business schools. The typical business school employs longer lists constructed by the Chartered Association of Business Schools, the Australian Business Deans Council and Scimago. The new FT Top 50 list is provided below. Congrats to Turner College faculty who have published from this list in the past, such as Charles Boster (accounting), Deborah Kidder (management), Laurence Marsh (management), Frank Mixon (economics) and Ed O'Donnell (marketing). Academy of Management Annals Academy of Management Journal Academy of Management Review Accounting Review Accounting, Organizations and Society Administrative Science Quarterly American Economic Review American Sociological Review Contemporar...