As TSYS School computer science professor Yi Zhou and his colleagues from Jinan University and the University of Maine explain in their new study, data deduplication has been widely used in backup storage systems to improve storage utilization and extend device lifetime by reducing data writes. Inline deduplication, in particular, removes redundant data in real-time as data is being sent to the storage system. However, it causes data fragmentation, meaning that logically consecutive chunks are physically scattered across various containers after data deduplication. Many existing rewrite algorithms aim to alleviate the performance degradation due to fragmentation by rewriting fragmented duplicate chunks as unique chunks into new containers. Unfortunately, these algorithms determine whether a chunk is fragmented based on a simple pre-set fixed value, ignoring the variance of data characteristics between data segments. This means that when backups are restored, they often fail to select an appropriate set of old containers for rewrite, generating a substantial number of invalid chunks in retrieved containers. To address this issue, Zhou and his colleagues propose an inline deduplication approach for storage systems, called InDe, which detects valid container utilization and dynamically adjusts the number of old container references in each segment. InDe is designed to improve restore performance while maintaining high backup performance by identifying appropriate containers for the rewrite. Lastly, Zhou and his colleagues are able to evaluate InDe using three real-world backup workloads. The experimental results presented in the study, which appears in the current issue of ACM Transactions on Storage, show that compared to two other state-of-the-art algorithms, InDe improves restore speed by 1.3 to 2.4 times while also achieving similar backup performance.
The long-awaited journal review being conducted by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) has been released and there are a number of news items that relate to faculty in the Turner College. One of these is the ABDC's decision to now include Compensation and Benefits Review in its journal rankings. This is big news for the Turner College as its editor, Phil Bryant , is a professor of management in the Turner College. The ABDC is proposing that the journal enter its system for the first time as a C-rated journal. Acting Turner College Dean Tesa Leonce sits on the journal's editorial board, while Turner College management professor Mark James has guest-edited an issue of the journal. Published by SAGE, Compensation & Benefits Review is the leading journal for senior executives and professionals who design, implement, evaluate and communicate compensation and benefits policies and programs. The journal supports compensation and benefits specialists and academic ex...

Comments
Post a Comment