In their study forthcoming in IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, TSYS School’s Anastasia Angelopoulou and her research colleagues at Auburn University assert that public sentiment can impact the implementation of public policies and even cause policy failure if public support does not exist. This means that knowledge of public sentiment concerning new and emerging policies is critical for policymakers. The COVID-19 pandemic offers a useful example, given that various precautionary measures have been either implemented or suggested in an attempt to delay or mitigate the spread of the virus. Angelopoulou’s new study presents a framework that applies natural language processing (NLP) techniques in order to characterize the public sentiment on three prominent COVID-19 mitigation measures – mask wearing, social distancing, and quarantining – as shared by Twitter users in the United States. As part of the framework, the researchers apply a bigram graph-based approach to visualize the most frequent topics in Twitter discussions during the COVID-19 pandemic in an effort to provide insights into the most commonly discussed topics among Twitter users with similar demographic characteristics (e.g., age and gender). Bigram analyses indicates that Twitter discussions containing positive sentiment prevailed and revolved around the benefits of the measures and trust in the government, while the topics of negative sentiment involved conspiracy theories, skepticism, and distrust of government mandates. The analyses also suggest that discussions among people in the 19 to 29 age bracket, and those over 40 years old, focus on government officials and political parties, benefits or inefficiency of mitigation measures, and conspiracy theories more often than other demographic groups.
The long-awaited journal review being conducted by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) has been released and there are a number of news items that relate to faculty in the Turner College. One of these is the ABDC's decision to now include Compensation and Benefits Review in its journal rankings. This is big news for the Turner College as its editor, Phil Bryant , is a professor of management in the Turner College. The ABDC is proposing that the journal enter its system for the first time as a C-rated journal. Acting Turner College Dean Tesa Leonce sits on the journal's editorial board, while Turner College management professor Mark James has guest-edited an issue of the journal. Published by SAGE, Compensation & Benefits Review is the leading journal for senior executives and professionals who design, implement, evaluate and communicate compensation and benefits policies and programs. The journal supports compensation and benefits specialists and academic ex...


Comments
Post a Comment